The way markets work is that they are always seeking an equilibrium where consumers are willing and able to buy a certain number of goods, and firms are willing and able to sell them. If firms try to sell a product for a higher price, fewer people will buy it. This will cause a surplus. In response, the firms will lower their price to sell their stock. If the situation is reversed and the price is too low, there will be a shortage of the good and the suppliers will start selling the good at a higher price. So, eventually the market will gravitate toward the equilibrium price and quantity.
Minimum wage disrupts this relationship because it puts what is known as a price floor on the good, which in this case is labor. When a price floor is put on a good, that means the price is higher than the equilibrium price. As I mentioned above, that will cause a surplus. In other words, more people will be looking for jobs than firms are looking for employees. People who are able to get jobs will be better off, but there will be more people who don't get jobs.
Another effect is that the people applying for minimum wage jobs will become more qualified because they are unable to find employment elsewhere. These more qualified people will get the jobs while unskilled workers may be cut out of the market. So, middle class families may benefit from minimum wage while in the meantime, lower class families are suffering.
Additionally, a study done at Stanford revealed that many times owners will increase prices in response to having to pay higher wages. Since many of the places that hire minimum wage workers sell their products to poorer Americans, the poor are in essence paying a tax to help employ the middle class.
Now, while all of the assertions I have made up until this point are true, they are all based on a simplified model of the world. These models cannot be accurate in every situation. There have actually been instances where minimum wage has helped increase pay without decreasing employment (see here).
So, what does this mean? Have we gotten any closer to finding the answer? The short answer is that it really depends. There are always trade-offs involved. It cannot be denied, however, that the poorest people are hurt by minimum wage. So, when looking at candidates in this year's election, think long and hard about what you value. While both parties have good intentions, their methods of economic policy have two very different effects.
Photos compliments of:
The All-Nite Images
Wikipedia
Lisa, I love the fact you are very studious when it comes to your research. You are referencing books, universities, and also YouTube to help improve your credibility when you write your blog. In addition, when it comes to minimum wage, you did not have any bias when constructing your viewpoints. You recognized the opposing and supporting view points of minimum wage.
ReplyDeleteExceptional work!
DeleteLisa,
ReplyDeleteI love how you are able to link your blog to your studies, it gives you much more credibility on the subject. I enjoy your blog because you present both sides the argument without any overbearing or clear bias. I look forward to your next post.
I'm always conflicted when I try to make a decision as to where I stand on this issue. When I was reading your blog post, at first I felt very strongly that we should not raise the minimum wage for the reasons you listed. But when I watched the video, at the end he talks about the visible benefits of raising the minimum wage and then I was for raising the wage. Thank you for clearing up the details of both sides of the argument!
ReplyDeleteLisa, very interesting post- props to you for picking such a complex issue to tackle! I agree with Tim- your post was made much more approachable by the fact that you were able to speak from your own studies in the subject. And you have great timing with the presidential election coming up!
ReplyDelete