Thursday, September 17, 2015

The Power of a Single Story

In her TED talk "The Dangers of a Single Story," Chimamanda Adichie explains that when we take stereotypes at face value and use them to describe a group of people by a "single story," we are often missing a large part of who they are. She illustrates this with many comical examples including the observations one might make of Americans if their only experience with them was the novel American Psycho (see the picture below for her observation). While this is clearly an exaggeration, it still illustrates the point: we should look beyond the single story.

But, there are instances where the single story is more convenient; where we only want a small snip of someone's personality. For example, a college application. An icebreaker activity. A Facebook or LinkedIn profile. A resume. In these moments, many of us struggle to define ourselves, to boil down all of our experiences into one single statement.

This week in his column, David Brooks wrote a piece entitled The Biden Formation Story, which referred to Stephen Colbert's interview with Vice President Joe Biden on The Late Show. During the interview, Biden told his single story to the audience, what Brooks refers to as his "formation story." In that story, Biden described his reluctance to run for President after having undergone the emotional trauma of losing his son this past year. But, while his story was meant to explain why he decided not to run, the story he told was one of a true candidate.

Brooks argues that "every presidential candidate needs a narrative to explain how his or her character was formed...some experience or life-defining crucible moment that then defines the nature of their public service." In essence, they need the single story that Adichie refers to. They need a way to express who they are and why they are here.

In this context, I agree with Brooks. Without the single story, "a candidate is just a hodgepodge of positions and logos." As a people, we want to elect someone who we can relate to, who can lead our country to greatness, and who can make the world a place we want our children to live in. A single story is powerful; it shapes how we think of someone - for better or worse. Right now Hilary Clinton's story is more about scandal and defensiveness than about making a difference. Biden, on the other hand, has the potential to make his story one of redemption, to rise up and accept responsibility for the American people.

As we get closer to the 2016 election, it will be interesting to see how these stories change. Will Biden enter the race? Will Hilary share her story with the world? But, no matter what the result, the single story will live on. Adichie advocates that we push to learn more beyond the single story, to get to know someone beyond their accomplishments. I would like to think that because we want people to be informed, we give them the opportunity to learn more than the single story. That is why we have so many televised debates and discussions with the candidates. The reality, however, is that most people will only ever want to know the single story. The key to determining this race will be how the candidates tell their stories. A story told at the right place and the right time might just win the election.

Images compliments of:
AZ Quotes
West Point - The US Military Academy 

6 comments:

  1. I like the way how you compared and contrast Hilary Clinton and Biden. But the way how you did it, was very insightful! You used a quote from Brooks to connect deeper to presidential topic. Therefore, your usage of outside information that blended so well on what you are talking about is very well crafted, and makes me excited to see what is your next blog post! Thank you Lisa!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I enjoyed reading your posting since I am very interested in politics. Your example on VP Joe Biden made your topic easy to understand(very appropriate example). However, I somewhat disagree with "Power of Single story." Because I personally believe that candidates' personal story can not be the major factor of being the leader of the United States. Although I still think that personal story and personal connection of that candidate is important, there are many more things that should be considered more: Their political experience, their ideologies, their attitude toward certain political event, and etc. But I thoroughly enjoyed reading! Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is such an awesome approach for a blog. The fact that you follow a conservative writer while you are more liberal is a great way to make more informed opinions. I agree that most citizens want a single story of a candidate so that they know exactly where they stand on issues and do not want a candidate who is constantly flip-flopping their views

    ReplyDelete
  5. I love Chimamanda Adichie's TED talk. I've watched it several times and everytime it makes me think a little bit more about the "dangers of a single story". I agree with you that politicians, in order not to appear spread too thin, to appear focused, sort of need a single story. But it's important that people search for information that explores more about a politicians character than just their tagline. Your blog is great - interesting, relevant, and thought provoking!

    ReplyDelete
  6. What an awesome analysis and conclusion! We need to talk about the election after class one day...

    I only got a little confused when you briefly touched upon the standpoint of Brooks. One more sentence talking about his views would do the trick :)

    Finally, I totally empathize with the notion that we need to avoid blanket statements. Unfortunately, that seems to be the overwhelming trend. Sound bytes and scrolling headlines are two of several examples of abbreviated news coverage that Americans are assessing as acceptable information sources by themselves, which fuels this tendency of all-encompassing analyses.

    ReplyDelete